
Most of us know the feeling - you finish work, sit down to relax, and a notification pops up. A quick check turns into another task, and suddenly the evening you planned disappears. Even after shutting down laptops, many employees mentally stay “logged in.”
And while no one created this culture intentionally, it simply evolved because of global teams, digital tools, and the desire to stay efficient. But now, organisations everywhere are asking a new question:
What if we could build a healthier, more sustainable work culture where employees are allowed to disconnect without guilt, fear, or pressure?
This is where the idea of the Right to Disconnect becomes important, not as a legal debate but as a wellness necessity. It is not a rebellion against work but a step toward better performance, healthier employees, and more human workplaces.
For many people, this isn’t about restricting work; it’s about making space for rest, family, and well-being.
Let’s explore what could change if this becomes a core part of workplace wellness.
Here’s the truth: Humans are not designed for constant cognitive load. When the mind doesn’t get recovery time, it slips into fatigue, irritability, sleep issues, and eventually burnout.
Most employees don’t need less work. They simply need predictable boundaries. And when those boundaries are absent, wellness starts to break down in small ways:
None of this is about “bad bosses” or “unhealthy companies.” It is simply the natural outcome of a digitally connected world.
A structured Right to Disconnect is not about restricting productivity. It is about restoring the human energy that productivity depends on.
The Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025 has been introduced in Parliament and is now under discussion, but it has not yet become law. At the moment, the Bill represents a proposal aimed at helping employees establish clear boundaries between work hours and personal time. It suggests that workers should have the freedom to switch off after their official shift ends without worrying about phone calls, late-night messages, or work-related emails.
The Bill also puts forward the idea of creating an authority that would look into complaints, guide organisations in forming healthier communication policies, and help employees understand their rights. Some states such as Kerala have shown interest by exploring similar concepts, signalling that the conversation around disconnecting is gaining national relevance.
Even so, many parts of the Bill will evolve as more discussions take place. Like any major workplace reform, this one will require input from employers, HR teams, employees, and policymakers before it reaches its final shape.
Instead of framing this as “companies should stop doing this,” let’s imagine what becomes better when the Right to Disconnect is embraced as a wellness principle. Here are the most realistic and wellness-focused changes that could unfold:
Clear boundaries would mean fewer unexpected calls or messages after hours. Employees would finally know when the workday really ends, which can significantly reduce stress and improve emotional stability.
With uninterrupted evenings, people would have more time to relax, exercise, eat mindfully, or simply rest; all of which contribute to better energy and stronger immunity. When the body knows it can shut down mentally after a certain hour, recovery becomes easier and more consistent.
Switching off work notifications allows the brain to slow down and transition into rest mode. Improved sleep quality often leads to better focus, productivity, and emotional balance the next day. Over time, this can help reduce the risk of burnout.
Family time often gets disrupted by last-minute work follow-ups. If the Bill passes, evenings can become more predictable, helping people reconnect with loved ones, invest time in hobbies, and feel more present at home.
With personal time respected, employees may show up to work more refreshed, creative, and productive. Organisations may also discover that when communication boundaries are clear, teams cooperate more efficiently and make fewer errors.
India’s work culture values dedication and going the extra mile. If the Bill becomes law, it won’t change the culture overnight; but it may gently encourage workplaces to adopt a more balanced approach where performance is measured by outcomes rather than availability.
Employees across industries are seeking more stability in their daily routines, and protected disconnect hours because:
Every message demands attention and creates micro-stress. A disconnected window gives the mind time to cool down.
When work overlaps with family time, relationships weaken. Restoring boundaries strengthens home life.
Newer employees prioritize mental health and well-being as much as growth.
Companies that adopt this approach will be more attractive to talent.
Even high performers feel the impact. A Right to Disconnect framework brings balance back before burnout becomes severe.
A practical and neutral approach works best:
The Right to Disconnect isn’t about switching off from work. It’s about switching on to life, so employees return to work healthier, happier, and more capable.
If companies move toward this, not as a rule but as a wellness philosophy, we could see workplaces where:
A better future is possible—and it begins with something as simple as permission to switch off.